You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Ask Me Anything - Marky Edition

in AskMe4 years ago

Again, you're talking nonsense. I criticize Hive all the time. No one is calling me a hater.

If you criticize Hive and lift up steem though, that's a whole other thing and don't expect people to like you.
If you can't understand why that is I can't help you.

Posted using Dapplr

Sort:  

When did I lift up Steem again?

I was talking about the users and about using incentives instead of punishment for them to choose HIVE over Stemm, but like I said, the hatred for Steem doesn't allow you to actually focus on the real point of this whole discussion, and keeps circling back to "oooo steem is bad, Justin is bad..."

But here is a little secret: The average user don't care about the "drama" that happened on the past, they will use the best platform for their needs, and the hostile attitude coming from some big stakeholders can be a good solid reason for them not using HIVE and move to Steem.

I think everyone agreed that for HIVE to grow, it need to attract more users right?

Maybe I am wrong, and these stakeholders only want HIVE to be their particular playground where you must be friends with the rich kid to be allowed to play...

and the hostile attitude coming from some big stakeholders can be a good solid reason for them not using HIVE and move to Steem.

Who are these people youre talking about? Youre making shit up. Making up a problem that doesnt exist.
Someone is attacking people who crosspost on Steem?

Im asking again, who are these people that attack others SIMPLY for crossposting and who is it exactly thats attacked.
I want to help defend them if that is the case. But you gotta tell me who these people are.
You cant just make a claim and expect me to accept it because you pretend to stand on the side of "justice". You gotta have someone thats victimized to claim justice.
You cant just make up something bad and claim its happening when its not.

Damn, you seem to have a problem understanding the point of a discussion...

This kind of attitude happened more than one time, but I won't spend my time going through the whole HIVE blockchain history and Discord talk just to give you more examples. I got more important stuff to do with my time.

But anyway, the way you are treating this debate is exactly what happens when someone around here tries to bring to light anything that someone thing is wrong with the direction this blockchain is going...

Why talk about the core problem of the issue raised (i this case, the hostility culture that exists toward those that act in a way the big stakeholders don't agree with) when you can "demand" the other part to show proof, right?

but I won't spend my time going through the whole HIVE blockchain history and Discord talk just to give you more examples

lol. Look. If you cant back what you say then STFU and dont say anything.
I know that sounds harsh but theres nothing else i can tell you.

But anyway, the way you are treating this debate is exactly what happens when someone around here tries to bring to light anything that someone thing is wrong with the direction this blockchain is going...

Youre not "bringing light" to anything. Youre making shit up and you cant back anything you say. Youre fabricating an issue and arguing for it. The issue youre arguing for isnt real, its not happening. Your inability to provide examples a proof of it after a dozen comments..

Why talk about the core problem of the issue raised (i this case, the hostility culture that exists toward those that act in a way the big stakeholders don't agree with) when you can "demand" the other part to show proof, right?

Wow. So when someone makes any kind of accusation we should discuss it and disregard that the accusers have 0 evidence to support it. #JustBelieveAccusers
You know what? We should move to a more serious accusation.
All HIVE witnesses are rapists.
You want evidence? Well:
Why talk about the core problem of the issue raised, when you can "demand" the other part to show proof, right?

Dude, you dont know how to think. You need to learn how to think and im not trying to attack your intelligence. Knowing how to think is something you can legitimately learn. If you want i can point you towards some helpful materials.
This is just a waste of time.
I can make fun of you if you want. I can stomp on you so hard that you wont be able to look another man in the eye for a month but i want to help you.
Google: "Skeptical empiricism" and "scientific method" and go from there. If will help you with everything in life.

oooo look at you, i am so jealous that you "know how to think" and I don't.

But tell me, how is an ad hominem argument actually showing you know how to think?

I could look around for more examples, and there is plenty around, but not really with time to dig through them, so... be my guest if you want to do it.

But sure, keep your way of screaming like a kid "hey mom, he called my toy ugly! i will call him ugly back!" and let's see where this will end up...

You just shown you dont know how to think by making the absurd argument you made. Thats not an ad hominem attack.

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

Source: Wikipedia

Say again?