We have tried such proposals in the past. Few were interested in supporting it. Just as few only were ever interested in supporting us in any way. Almost non of major whales/investors have ever been interested in supporting us.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Like using the DHF? Or are you talking about in general?
We attempted SPS and were told that we would have to chance. DHF would go the same way. Besides adm is has been generously supporting us since the start and is happy to do so. The only investor that has ever cared.
And we are happy with that too.
Imo, each curator projects could apply for DHF to get funding to create their abuse fighting group that sieves abuse beore they curate (that they repeatedly upvote abuse. Sometimes such obvious abuse that it is evident that they don't even read the posts).
They could have 2-3 investigators checking all the posts that they plan to upvote. If they will not get funding for it from DHF, I would be happy to add their investigations' reports into steemcleaners daily curation so they can get some rewards for it. And I am sure that other would follow up with curation.
Well, from the poll, at the time of this comment, at least one whale cares.
The alternative of voting their reports is another approach.