I lost my faith in youtube, a long time ago. They will never achieve the status of becoming a fair platform for free speech. The userbase tries very hard to present arguements on both sides of controversial subjects, but ultimately youtube will ban anything they wish.
Youtube is part of the problem supporting media bias. Look at all of the wikipedia "facts" they plug underneath videos they consider controversial.
I'm not convinced there is any truth to the 5G theory that it causes coronovirus symptoms, but I an open to letting people publish their views and evidence. Yes, shame on youtube.
However, I am pretty sure they can get sued in some countries for allowing dangerous science (making bombs, drugs, computer virus, etc.) to become leaked to the public. If people are taking the advice of to ignore official health measures and try non-sanctioned alternatives to counteract dangerous diseases because of a video or article they saw, I think the author and platform that hosts these opinions can be held liable for a person who dies as a result.
I'm not a fan of these laws, but I think they exist, and judges are expected to uphold them. It explains why free speech does fully exist outside of anonymous platforms.
Amazing to learn this. Thank you for taking the time to share it with me. Having watched the film I can say she wasn't offering any kind of safety advice other than don't live near 5G. Which I'm pretty sure can't be argued to be bad for anyone except 5G providers.
I threw my phone away a long time ago and only turn the wifi on when I need it. So for me personally I don't really care about 5G but I do think there are lots of unanswered questions around it. Like why there have been no safety trials prior to deciding it would be beamed down on us from above?
So by not permitting us to ask the question they are really only confirming there is something more to this story. Time will tell...