Wie dumm von mir, den Beitrag in der nicht-so-toleranten(*) "Deutschen" Gruppe zu teilen. Oder müsste es heßen: Wie "Deutsch" von mir, den Beitrag in der nicht-so-dummen Gruppe zu teilen? Reden wir also wieder über VT und Zensur, statt über Kinderschutz, während weiter "Kinderschutz" betrieben wird? Wer ist hier eigentlich der Dumme? Happy comments.
How stupid of me to share the contribution in the not-so-tolerant(*) "German" group. Or should I say: How "German" of me to share the contribution in the not-so-dumb group? So are we talking about VT and censorship again, instead of child protection, while "child protection" continues to be an issue? Who is the stupid one here? Glückliche Kommentare.
Translated from the screenshot:
Group rules that have been violated: 1 No conspiracy ideologies, no racism, etc
Crude conspiracy theories, sexism, racism, nationalism, anti-Semitism, etc. have no room here. We also delete links to pages of corresponding political contexts.
Paradox of tolerance
The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that, "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." The paradox of tolerance is an important concept for thinking about which boundaries can or should be set.
Wie dumm von mir, den Beitrag in der nicht-so-toleranten(*) "Deutschen" Gruppe zu teilen. Oder müsste es heßen: Wie "Deutsch" von mir, den Beitrag in der nicht-so-dummen Gruppe zu teilen? Reden wir also wieder über VT und Zensur, statt über Kinderschutz, während weiter "Kinderschutz" betrieben wird? Wer ist hier eigentlich der Dumme? Happy comments.
(*) Dort wird erklärt mit dem https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toleranz-Paradoxon
English
How stupid of me to share the contribution in the not-so-tolerant(*) "German" group. Or should I say: How "German" of me to share the contribution in the not-so-dumb group? So are we talking about VT and censorship again, instead of child protection, while "child protection" continues to be an issue? Who is the stupid one here? Glückliche Kommentare.
Translated from the screenshot:
(*) There it is explained with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Paradox of tolerance
The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that, "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." The paradox of tolerance is an important concept for thinking about which boundaries can or should be set.