Struktureller Kinderschutz?! - Structural child protection?!

[andrepol]

Ein Faden, der bei facebook bislang zwar Aufmerksamkeit bekam, doch noch keine Antworten.

Hier ist der Faden:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/freilerner.netzwerk/permalink/2922643774459383/

Und hier ist der Inhalt:

Noch ein Wort zum DKSB (Deutscher Kinderschutzbund), der mir aufgrund von Ekkehard von Braunmühls Schilderungen in "Zeit für Kinder Teil 3" bereits negativ auffiel:

Von deren Webseite:

"Kinder haben Rechte! [..] Diese sind z.B.:
das Recht auf kindgerechte Entwicklung
das Recht auf gute Versorgung
das Recht auf Schutz vor seelischer und körperlicher Gewalt
das Recht auf Mitbestimmung"

Frage: Wie groß ist denn der Anteil des DKSB-Engagements beim Thema Schulabstinenz und struktureller Gewalt? Müsste sich der DKSB für Unschooling und Homeschooling stark machen, wenn es um oben zitierte Rechte geht?!

---

Danke an Didgeman und pixabay für das Bild.

English

A thread that has been getting attention on facebook but no answers yet.

Here is the thread:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/freilerner.netzwerk/permalink/2922643774459383/

And here is the content:

One more word about the DKSB (German Child Protection League), which I already noticed negatively due to Ekkehard von Braunmuehl's descriptions in "Time for Children Part 3":

From their website:

"Children have rights! [...] These are for example
the right to development appropriate for children
the right to good care
the right to protection against mental and physical violence
the right to co-determination"

Question: How large is the share of DKSB's commitment to the issue of school abstinence and structural violence? Would the DKSB have to stand up for unschooling and homeschooling when it comes to the rights cited above?

---

Thanks to Didgeman and pixabay for the image.

Comments

[homeedders]

A good question indeed. I can see why answers are being avoided.

[andrepol]

Oh yes, thanks for stopping by and chiming in on an importand thought! And it lets me think of this "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you and then they give in." How so complicated? !BEER !invest_vote !COFFEEA

[beerlover]

^{View or trade BEER.}

Hey @homeedders, here is a little bit of BEER from @andrepol for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking.

[investinthefutur]

@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?

[coffeea.token]

Lucky you @homeedders here is your COFFEEA, view all your tokens at steem-engine.com Vote for c0ff33a as Witness

[commentcoin]

You have used the Hashtag #[CC] and can now reward 100.0 comments under your post with one CC.

More information about the Commentcoin-Project can be found on this account.
You can easily add an upvote to this post to support the project.
Thanks for using it.

Happy comments.
Your CC-Team:
@kristall97 ([Code-Designer])
@alucian ([Project-Designer])

[andrepol]

#posh https://www.facebook.com/groups/FreilerneninDeutschland/permalink/1557197614442661/

[andrepol]

Wie dumm von mir, den Beitrag in der nicht-so-toleranten(*) "Deutschen" Gruppe zu teilen. Oder müsste es heßen: Wie "Deutsch" von mir, den Beitrag in der nicht-so-dummen Gruppe zu teilen? Reden wir also wieder über VT und Zensur, statt über Kinderschutz, während weiter "Kinderschutz" betrieben wird? Wer ist hier eigentlich der Dumme? Happy comments.

(*) Dort wird erklärt mit dem https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toleranz-Paradoxon

---

English

How stupid of me to share the contribution in the not-so-tolerant(*) "German" group. Or should I say: How "German" of me to share the contribution in the not-so-dumb group? So are we talking about VT and censorship again, instead of child protection, while "child protection" continues to be an issue? Who is the stupid one here? Glückliche Kommentare.

Translated from the screenshot:

Group rules that have been violated:
1 No conspiracy ideologies, no racism, etc
Crude conspiracy theories, sexism, racism, nationalism, anti-Semitism, etc. have no room here. We also delete links to pages of corresponding political contexts.

(*) There it is explained with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[wikitextbot]

Paradox of tolerance
The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that, "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." The paradox of tolerance is an important concept for thinking about which boundaries can or should be set.

[investinthefutur]

Du wurdest als Member von @investinthefutur gevotet! ---> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
Eine kleine Dividende a little bit !BEER

[beerlover]

^{View or trade BEER.}

Hey @andrepol, here is a little bit of BEER from @investinthefutur for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking.

[andrepol]

#posh https://www.facebook.com/groups/118566732679/permalink/10156685214222680/

[steemitboard]

Congratulations @andrepol! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 8000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 9000 upvotes.

_{You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

Downvote challenge - Add up to 3 funny badges to your board

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!