The very likely keep a lot of stuff hidden, but the specifics are difficult to verify. I try not to jump to any specific conclusions without adequate evidence.
The evidence about free energy exists. The fact that you don't know the evidences is another problem.
Now, free energy is kept hidden by our rulers, because free people can't be ruled.
Now we're ruled by others because people don't want to rule themselves, because allowing others to be responsible for themselves is easier than being responsible.
As long as people are unconscious, they choose what's easy.
Choosing what's right (e.g. responsibility) implies freedom of choice that is a component of consciousness.
i don't see how energy can be a problem in a world in which people are conscious.
In this world, free energy is not kept hidden, because we don't have rulers, because people can rule themselves.
When free energy is no longer kept hidden, we no longer have energy problems.
Not to mention that our problems are man-made through overconsumption - that is caused by the fact that people run by social conditioning, because they're unconscious.
In a world in which people are conscious, we don't have energy problems - whether we have free energy or no free energy.
I've investigated every "alternative" energy claim I've been able to find, and there is no "over parity".
Regardless of what is "kept secret", any hypothetical energy source is going to be INDUSTRIAL.
People will be complacent as long as they are comfortable. TV and cheeseburgers.
Nobody is 100% "asleep" and or 100% "awake". We're all in various states of "awareness" that are not "attained" and then kept indefinitely. Even the most "awake" person on earth has their blindspots.
Ok.
I'm not convinced human good will and speculative (INDUSTRIAL) technology is going to sustain 7.5 billion lives.
The very likely keep a lot of stuff hidden, but the specifics are difficult to verify. I try not to jump to any specific conclusions without adequate evidence.
So what's your opinion about depopulation? Do you support the idea?
I'm 100% +proHUMAN.
I just don't see any way to keep 7.5 billion people alive without crude oil and coal.
Please let me know if you have any ideas.
The evidence about free energy exists. The fact that you don't know the evidences is another problem.
Now, free energy is kept hidden by our rulers, because free people can't be ruled.
Now we're ruled by others because people don't want to rule themselves, because allowing others to be responsible for themselves is easier than being responsible.
As long as people are unconscious, they choose what's easy.
Choosing what's right (e.g. responsibility) implies freedom of choice that is a component of consciousness.
i don't see how energy can be a problem in a world in which people are conscious.
In this world, free energy is not kept hidden, because we don't have rulers, because people can rule themselves.
When free energy is no longer kept hidden, we no longer have energy problems.
Not to mention that our problems are man-made through overconsumption - that is caused by the fact that people run by social conditioning, because they're unconscious.
In a world in which people are conscious, we don't have energy problems - whether we have free energy or no free energy.
What do you think about that?
I've investigated every "alternative" energy claim I've been able to find, and there is no "over parity".
Regardless of what is "kept secret", any hypothetical energy source is going to be INDUSTRIAL.
People will be complacent as long as they are comfortable. TV and cheeseburgers.
Nobody is 100% "asleep" and or 100% "awake". We're all in various states of "awareness" that are not "attained" and then kept indefinitely. Even the most "awake" person on earth has their blindspots.
Ok.
I'm not convinced human good will and speculative (INDUSTRIAL) technology is going to sustain 7.5 billion lives.
Didn't you say you're proHUMAN?
100%