Agreed. They can easily manipulate number of cases, and they're trying to make it seem like a big deal. Even the inflated death number is still pretty moderate for a flu year. Never been a lockdown over the flu, even on the worst years.
Agreed. They can easily manipulate number of cases, and they're trying to make it seem like a big deal. Even the inflated death number is still pretty moderate for a flu year. Never been a lockdown over the flu, even on the worst years.
Yup. Media is going nuts selling the "highest daily new cases" thing, when lots of older tests are added and it just makes it less lethal anyways. Great more cases, lower deaths, wonderful, but most ppl don't have a clue.
Yeah.
And to take that to the next level, you seen the latest BS saying infected with minor symptoms or no symptoms usually don't end up with antibodies?
What that means for Sweden is, they're testing their population and only finding about 20% of people have antibodies, not enough for herd immunity. And it's not going up very fast anymore, even though they don't have lockdown.
This tells me, their entire population has already been exposed and/or had it. Just about every single person that hasn't been in isolation this whole time.
And still, they didn't lose as many people as Belgium, or Italy, or Spain, or the UK, and only slightly more than the USA. And their economy is healthy and they've got no lockdown to lift.
There is also the T cells fighting off the infection that doesn't produce any anti-bodies. 40-60% of people have t cells immunity: https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@krnel/study-suggests-80-of-people-allegedly-infected-with-covid-19-have-no-antibodies
It all adds up to the lockdown being COMPLETELY inappropriate, way too harsh, and way too long. A short isolation for those who didn't want to risk illness during the main peak should have been done, and a bunch of research, and none of the draconian shit they'll never reverse.