No.
You cannot have reactive morals, without the threat or enacting of violence.
("try to rape, me, and I'll blow your brains out")
...adhere to the basic principles of _reactive morals, and all social other problems will look after themselves (negotiation, not force).
So, a political party that adheres to reactive moral principles will condone violence - but only self defense, preventing theft, etc).
Any proactive moral principles (that's supported by a political party) has violence hardwired into the methodology of being able to achieve those ambitions.. by definition.
'Ambitions' that can never be achieved - but ones that legitimize the continuation of violence.
It's a 'get out of jail free card' to all those that want violence. (they care not about the 'cause')
No.
You cannot have reactive morals, without the threat or enacting of violence.
("try to rape, me, and I'll blow your brains out")
...adhere to the basic principles of _reactive morals, and all social other problems will look after themselves (negotiation, not force).
So, a political party that adheres to reactive moral principles will condone violence - but only self defense, preventing theft, etc).
Any proactive moral principles (that's supported by a political party) has violence hardwired into the methodology of being able to achieve those ambitions.. by definition.
'Ambitions' that can never be achieved - but ones that legitimize the continuation of violence.
It's a 'get out of jail free card' to all those that want violence. (they care not about the 'cause')
Thanks!
you're very welcome