if 3x necessary explosives are used in the Nord Stream case
Not sure what your context is. Why do you think Nordstream needed 3x the explosives than other pipelines would need to blow up?
if 3x necessary explosives are used in the Nord Stream case
Not sure what your context is. Why do you think Nordstream needed 3x the explosives than other pipelines would need to blow up?
You put that there.
Ahso. What I meant was that three explosives for two pipelines is one explosive too much. My speculation would be that Russia may have booby-trapped three pipelines with three explosives and when they took them, they places two of them on the same pipeline.
Why placing them at one place and move them later? I can't see circumstantial evidence which could indicate that. To be honest the reason after all is not that coherent. But on the other hand English is just my 2nd language.