Of course if this "conspiracy theory" is actually true, those behind it would naturally be denying the claims. To trust the same media that is clearly a major part of the largest orchestrated propaganda and censorship campaign in US history to tell us the truth is insane. Even if the Hammer and Scorecard "scandal" goes absolutely nowhere, it doesn't magically erase the mounting evidence of wide scale fraud which is becoming far too overwhelming for anyone to ignore. Thus the unprecedented censorship and propaganda.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
All I’ve seen is claims and assertions. Actual evidence of “wide scale fraud” seems to be mighty hard to scrounge up. I know it’s a crazy idea but maybe, just maybe, it doesn’t make a strong case for “wide scale fraud” if you’re reduced to offering a $1 million reward for evidence of such fraud.
And by the way, the head of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is a Trump appointee.
Then you clearly haven't looked hard enough. 500 votes being subtracted from a candidate and given to the opponent in a nanosecond is evidence of fraud. A 138,000 dump of votes (accounting for about 3% of the total vote) in Michigan all going to Biden is evidence of fraud. A "glitch" causing 6,000 Trump votes to be flipped to Biden is at the least evidence that the system is prone to error, especially considering similar "glitch" did the same in another county with another candidate. When similar flipping of Trump votes to Biden also take place in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, it begins to look a lot more like a pattern of wide scale fraud than a few isolated "glitches."
A sworn affidavit of a postman witnessing backdating of ballots in PA and poll watchers witnessing the counting of illegal ballots is evidence of fraud. There are far too many statistical anomalies to list that constitute evidence of fraud or serious incompetence. You can't have 200% voter turnout as took place in some Wisconsin counties. Dead people can't vote, and yet they somehow did. Either that, or there was voter fraud.
But since you're responding to a post filled with evidence and links to more such evidence I presume you are aware of this. So the question is, why don't you address the actual evidence presented here and instead point out irrelevant facts, like who appointed the head of U.S. Cybersecurity? This doesn't address the statistical anomalies, the verifiable vote flipping, the mathematical impossibilities and the witnesses going on record with sworn affidavits testifying to having witnessed fraud firsthand.
It’s curious that this supposed evidence is making the rounds of the Trumpist echo chamber but doesn’t seem to be getting submitted as evidence in court filings where judges are accepting its probity. Any day now?
Only 85 pages worth of it is being included in the PA lawsuit, and the idea all this is only being circulated in "Trumpist echo chambers" is the fallacy fed to you by the mainstream narrative.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/11/pennsylvania-voter-fraud-the-lawsuit.php
It's circulating all through independent media circles, many of which have and continue to be outspoken Trump critics, like myself. I'm surprised you haven't noticed that, being you're commenting on a page of one who has openly for the entire duration of the Trump reign called out the Administration for its numerous lies and crimes against humanity. But, as the saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day. On this issue, the evidence backs up the Trump claims.
It's curious all those mindlessly repeating "baseless claims" and "no evidence of fraud" avoid challenging the evidence itself. Go ahead and ignore it, and continue refusing to actually confront what you claim doesn't constitute evidence, rather than challenging it. What is included in the lawsuits really has no bearing on the actual evidence being presented and circulated. If you find any of it to not suggest fraud, please explain away, addressing each and every anomaly, instance of apparent vote flipping, and the numerous other allegations. Or even just addressing a single one would be a great start. Until the fraud deniers do that, they are only digging a deeper hole for themselves as they ignore facts that suggest (but don't necessarily prove) fraud. Still waiting to hear how 200% voter turnout, apparent electronic vote flipping in multiple states, thousands of votes returned before being mailed, and dead people miraculously coming back to vote isn't evidence of fraud...
The debunking of “evidence” of fraud seems to be well underway:
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54811410