I have previously stated there are other reasons for NASA to fake photographs besides not being on the moon, which you have ignored and pretend instead I disagree NASA faked photography. I also agree that NASA's claim to have lost the technology to go to the moon falls flat, and I do not believe it. There is no good reason for you to imply I claimed otherwise.
I did not say that you have claimed otherwise, I have said that just those two things are enough to conclude it was all a fake.
The evidence of the Apollo program is voluminous.
No, they aren’t, as the movie convincingly show.
…Saturn V rocket launches fake?
No, they were not fake – but that is not a proof that Saturn V went to the moon. It was a good orbit vehicle. It went into orbit, and it has returned from the orbit. The rest is a TV fiction.
Why do you leap to conclusions insuperable with factual evidence?
The movie is full of evidence – if you want to look at it. Far better evidence than NASA ever offered.
Is the ISS fake, or were Kelly and Kornienko sacrificed by being irradiated? Why do you repeat such obvious misinformation?
ISS is at 380 km orbit. Far below Van Allen Belt and protected from the deadly radiation. If you would please to read the links you have send me, you will find this:
“Earth's two main belts extend from an altitude of about 640 to 58,000 km (400 to 36,040 mi)”
Nobody did go through Van Allen Belt. Russians had sent a protected probe with a various living Earth organisms at 800 km, and I thing only snails survived.
Please check your facts again.