I'm not sure how else to describe it to you. Did you miss part of my comment?
Now, those that ascribe to the communist label, do one thing VERY well, and that is Obfuscate their intentions. I find it most Dishonorable. Those on the 'far left' label camp in my neck of the woods, don't call themselves 'Communist', so no, they WILL NOT tell me the TRUTH. They use other words/labels, but their ACTIONS SPEAK louder than any of their words.
KNOW THEM BY THEIR ACTIONS
Well I am not going to make a list but I will give examples. Let's just say that any action that falls under the banner of pushing for the forceful removal of one's possessions/thoughts/actions, for the supposed betterment of, anything is considered communism by me, and there are many ways to be communist without the need for the label.
BLM for example, is a communist entity, and those that pursue/support it, are as such. Their 'leadership' announces their marxist goals.
The use of the weaponized term "White Privilege", is considered communist by me as well, yet those that use it, don't call themselves 'Communist'. There are many examples of such blatant communism hidden behind a banner of "Anti-Racist", which is why Trotsky pushed the idea of "Racism" so profusely.
Let's just say that any action that falls under the banner of pushing for the forceful removal of one's possessions/thoughts/actions, for the supposed betterment of, anything is considered communism by me,
This sounds like "eminent domain" ** and "civil asset forfeiture" ** which are "features" of "capitalist" ("corporatist") "societies" and NOT exclusively "communist" practices.
In 3 minutes,
BLM for example, is a communist entity, and those that pursue/support it, are as such. Their 'leadership' announces their marxist goals.
I'm pretty sure the "BLM" is primarily concerned with police brutality (a hallmark of fascism), which, honestly should be a concern for everyone.
I'm also not convinced that "marxist goals" are automatically "evil".
Their RHETORIC has been used to empower FEUDAL HIERARCHIES that fail to deliver on those "marxist goals", but that doesn't seem to be the fault of the "marxist goals" themselves.
For example, contrary to apparent popular belief, there are quite a few "schools of marxism" (and not one monolithic dogma).
Libertarian
Main article: Libertarian Marxism
Libertarian Marxism emphasize the anti-authoritarian and libertarian aspects of Marxism. Early currents of libertarian Marxism such as left communism emerged in opposition to Marxism–Leninism.[43]
Libertarian Marxism is often critical of reformist positions such as those held by social democrats. Libertarian Marxist currents often draw from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' later works, specifically the Grundrisse and The Civil War in France;[44] emphasizing the Marxist belief in the ability of the working class to forge its own destiny without the need for a vanguard party to mediate or aid its liberation.[45] Along with anarchism, libertarian Marxism is one of the main currents of libertarian socialism.[46]
Libertarian Marxism includes currents such as autonomism, council communism, De Leonism, Lettrism, parts of the New Left, Situationism, Socialisme ou Barbarie and workerism.[47] Libertarian Marxism has often had a strong influence on both post-left and social anarchists. Notable theorists of libertarian Marxism have included Maurice Brinton, Cornelius Castoriadis, Guy Debord, Raya Dunayevskaya, Daniel Guérin, C. L. R. James, Rosa Luxemburg, Antonio Negri, Anton Pannekoek, Fredy Perlman, Ernesto Screpanti, E. P. Thompson, Raoul Vaneigem and Yanis Varoufakis,[48] who claims that Marx himself was a libertarian Marxist.[49] - LINK
I forgot to add that all appears to be for zionism.. zionism > communism > socialism > corporatism > fake capitalism > religionism.
All the rhetoric that you think you know, comes from the head. We can't see the head, but we can see who reports to the head of the Beast.
Ok, I'm pretty sure it doesn't really matter what "race" may be "at the top of the pyramid", they all want exactly the same thing (more for themselves and less for everyone else).
Well, this goes very deep actually. It actually is about race, however it is on a 'time' scale that is way, way outside of what the mainstream history teaches us. Root races and such, that are completely unheard of in our mainstream. The ones at the top are heavily into Eugenics for their breed. They attempt to 'fine tune' their lines with the 'best'.
For the masses, it is not 'Eugenics'. The masses get Dysgenics. The masses are poised to be molded into one race, that is to resemble the "Eloi" of the more modern "Time Machine" movie. The original time machine movie had the Eloi as Aryans and that had to be 'corrected' for today's Narrative which suits the goal, the Kalergi goal that they all honor at the top.
This sounds like "eminent domain" ** and "civil asset forfeiture" ** which are "features" of "capitalist" ("corporatist") "societies" and NOT exclusively "communist" practices.
Those are not 'Capitalist'. You liken it to 'Corporatist', which is odd. Corporatist is far, far more like Fascism.
I'm also not convinced that "marxist goals" are automatically "evil".
Ok. Not sure why you state this.... Sure not 'all' "goals" are...
I am not concerned with 'Labels', even if you bring forth 100 of them.
What we have in the usa is not in any way a shining example of "Capitalism". You'd be much more accurate with the corporatist label for the usa. HOwever it is quickly sliding into communism. All that is needed is for a Communist entity to continue to destroy society along with a nice plannedemic, and perhaps a good scandal for the beloved current figurehead in chief..
I'm not sure how else to describe it to you. Did you miss part of my comment?
What specific actions do you consider "proof positive" that someone is a "communist" (even if they insist they are NOT a "communist")?
Well I am not going to make a list but I will give examples. Let's just say that any action that falls under the banner of pushing for the forceful removal of one's possessions/thoughts/actions, for the supposed betterment of, anything is considered communism by me, and there are many ways to be communist without the need for the label.
BLM for example, is a communist entity, and those that pursue/support it, are as such. Their 'leadership' announces their marxist goals.
The use of the weaponized term "White Privilege", is considered communist by me as well, yet those that use it, don't call themselves 'Communist'. There are many examples of such blatant communism hidden behind a banner of "Anti-Racist", which is why Trotsky pushed the idea of "Racism" so profusely.
This sounds like "eminent domain" ** and "civil asset forfeiture" ** which are "features" of "capitalist" ("corporatist") "societies" and NOT exclusively "communist" practices.
In 3 minutes,
I'm pretty sure the "BLM" is primarily concerned with police brutality (a hallmark of fascism), which, honestly should be a concern for everyone.
I'm also not convinced that "marxist goals" are automatically "evil".
Their RHETORIC has been used to empower FEUDAL HIERARCHIES that fail to deliver on those "marxist goals", but that doesn't seem to be the fault of the "marxist goals" themselves.
For example, contrary to apparent popular belief, there are quite a few "schools of marxism" (and not one monolithic dogma).
Libertarian
Main article: Libertarian Marxism
Libertarian Marxism emphasize the anti-authoritarian and libertarian aspects of Marxism. Early currents of libertarian Marxism such as left communism emerged in opposition to Marxism–Leninism.[43]
Libertarian Marxism is often critical of reformist positions such as those held by social democrats. Libertarian Marxist currents often draw from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' later works, specifically the Grundrisse and The Civil War in France;[44] emphasizing the Marxist belief in the ability of the working class to forge its own destiny without the need for a vanguard party to mediate or aid its liberation.[45] Along with anarchism, libertarian Marxism is one of the main currents of libertarian socialism.[46]
Libertarian Marxism includes currents such as autonomism, council communism, De Leonism, Lettrism, parts of the New Left, Situationism, Socialisme ou Barbarie and workerism.[47] Libertarian Marxism has often had a strong influence on both post-left and social anarchists. Notable theorists of libertarian Marxism have included Maurice Brinton, Cornelius Castoriadis, Guy Debord, Raya Dunayevskaya, Daniel Guérin, C. L. R. James, Rosa Luxemburg, Antonio Negri, Anton Pannekoek, Fredy Perlman, Ernesto Screpanti, E. P. Thompson, Raoul Vaneigem and Yanis Varoufakis,[48] who claims that Marx himself was a libertarian Marxist.[49] - LINK
I forgot to add that all appears to be for zionism.. zionism > communism > socialism > corporatism > fake capitalism > religionism.
All the rhetoric that you think you know, comes from the head. We can't see the head, but we can see who reports to the head of the Beast.
Ok, I'm pretty sure it doesn't really matter what "race" may be "at the top of the pyramid", they all want exactly the same thing (more for themselves and less for everyone else).
Well, this goes very deep actually. It actually is about race, however it is on a 'time' scale that is way, way outside of what the mainstream history teaches us. Root races and such, that are completely unheard of in our mainstream. The ones at the top are heavily into Eugenics for their breed. They attempt to 'fine tune' their lines with the 'best'.
For the masses, it is not 'Eugenics'. The masses get Dysgenics. The masses are poised to be molded into one race, that is to resemble the "Eloi" of the more modern "Time Machine" movie. The original time machine movie had the Eloi as Aryans and that had to be 'corrected' for today's Narrative which suits the goal, the Kalergi goal that they all honor at the top.
Those are not 'Capitalist'. You liken it to 'Corporatist', which is odd. Corporatist is far, far more like Fascism.
Ok. Not sure why you state this.... Sure not 'all' "goals" are...
I am not concerned with 'Labels', even if you bring forth 100 of them.
What we have in the usa is not in any way a shining example of "Capitalism". You'd be much more accurate with the corporatist label for the usa. HOwever it is quickly sliding into communism. All that is needed is for a Communist entity to continue to destroy society along with a nice plannedemic, and perhaps a good scandal for the beloved current figurehead in chief..
TOTALITARIAN =/= MARXIST