No you are arguing that we are alive, I am saying, "Yes, yes we are, however, that does not inform whether we ought to be so"
Ok.
We are alive and being alive has a few logically necessary requirements or you might say, prerequisites.
One of these logically necessary prerequisites is "human survival instinct".
One of these logically necessary prerequisites is "human social instinct".
Because "human survival instinct" and "human social instinct" are both indisputable FACTS, they are both "IS" statements.
Our "human survival instinct" and "human social instinct" by their mere indisputable and logically necessary EXISTENCE motivate our sense of what humans "OUGHT" to do.
In other words, "IS" + "IS" = "OUGHT".
We just derived an "OUGHT" from an "IS".
Hume's Guillotine is defeated.