You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: I have unapproved top witnesses who are supporting hivewatchers aka quackwatch proposal

in Deep Dives3 years ago

It is spam, posting and commenting is ok but he is mentioning 100 people every time he's doing it, it is just fucking spam. They are paid to fight spam, not to spam

Sort:  

I agree with you. At this point, posting the same slanderous list over and over and over is just spam.

Have you tried MUTING quackers?

I don't like MUTE option

you're 100% right @mmmmkkkk311 I was there getting spamming with you just because of my views on the virus that has traumatized us all.

I dont know how tagging 100s of people like me and @mmmmkkkk311 isn't harassment or spam in the most blatant and obvious way, it would actually confuse me, beyond trusting someone's judgement on spam, if they took longer than 5 seconds looking at a @quackwatch post to identify spam.

I was also attacked by @logic and every time I speak with accusation of @logic, @quackwatch or berniesanders it seems @logiczombie is a commonly encountered voice of reason trying to persuade me and other users from downvoting someone who is spaming our username tags in a post.

I dont want to come off accusing @logiczombie because me and him have had good conversations about freespeech on this topic, but if this keeps coming up "I dont know whats up with quackwatch" its going to draw a very deep sense of suspicion from me.

I will leave this here.

You're definitely independent of these twats from what I have gathered, if the tagging stops by next month I will probably have even forgiven these distractions from a cause and effect standpoint.

I enjoyed that long youtube discussion, about the debates we have without taking into consideration what we are asking of others.

I'm honored by your attention.