So the mRNA that they are going to inject, which is essentially a virus, will then hypothetically go into cells and insert itself into the DNA, which will then replicate and then be in your body for the rest of your life and completely be unable to ever be removed as it will be part of your DNA.
You always have some good video recommendations. I am stunned by the amount you have in your "stash" :) Thank you anyway, I'll watch it probably this evening.
I would like you to come visit my newest blog entry. Seems like it needs a bit of attention in the comment-section.
A good friend who is a teacher in a Steiner school recently made me aware of this quote in this article.
It is interesting. I have had a conversation previously with @perceptualflaws regarding an overarching agenda to create a frequency prison where universal frequencies cannot breach.
I feel that there is a way through this and it is mainly with patience.
None of this can last forever. What we all deem spiritual in this instance is not relevant. It is that our minds cannot wander because the fields of information that govern the mind are constrained.
I feel however that those that truly wish a way through will find it.
Bummer, I haven't seen this article of yours earlier.
You raise some interesting points and the way and the choice of words Rudolf Steiner is said to have used sounds irritating and like something superstitious, doesn't it? This is what irritates people.
It irritated me too, but instead of immediately going into resistance and getting upset about this form of the words chosen, I asked myself whether I would be able to provide my own translation for this and, if necessary, choose alternative expressions to put what was said into a more generally accepted context.
The thing is that an exaggeration in the first place is the appropriate stylistic device to shake people out of their habitual ways of thinking and reacting. Now this form of shaking up is a balancing act. But attention is generated and that's the thing you can work with, isn't it?
What is so astonishing is the fact that Steiner apparently ascribes such a great effect to a remedy, here called vaccination, as that it could, for instance, change a person's mental constitution and prevent spiritual enlightenment. The "modern person" thinks: "No way, nothing could do that, it's all chemicals and has nothing to do with our spirits", no?
But in modern terms, one could say that drugs (hormone preparations and antidepressants, for example) influence a person's psyche and "calm" him down, which can mean that he becomes indifferent to his own emotions and no longer has extreme emotional changes, such as strong sadness or great joy.
I know from conversations with people who have taken medication for depression that they would henceforth be in a state of egalitarianism and that because of this they would be "protected" from these feelings that are so difficult to experience. Is that good, bad?
What could be interpreted as a spiritual experience, namely to allow a so-called extreme feeling of sadness, because it expresses a human need. In particular, people suffer and grieve when those around them give them the impression that such suffering is an imposition on the community. However, the administration of medication to "keep someone quiet for their own peace of mind" can just as easily be a protective assertion by those who do not wish to deal with grief, anger, fear and other so-called negative emotions or who feel overwhelmed by them.
It is obvious to me that such things happen because people have known for a long time that they have to function, no matter how they are doing mentally (spiritually), and that the suppression of individual crises, which express themselves through illness, reflects all the more strongly on an entire society that denies that it has to function for the most part, but is not allowed to give itself time, leisure, waiting. They key word is ""non-intervention" with the so called extreme expressions of a suffering person and let him be as he feels; also not medicating. Accept his emotional state until he recovers by himself, mainly for the reason perceiving himself as accepted, respected and tolerated within his state of being. But when a human does not experience others people patience, confidence and tolerance towards his state of being, things get worse, not better.
In an article of mine I tried to cover the topic of mental disease - it has also correlations to what we experience right now in this world.
In summary, I would say that both physical and mental illness are seen as hostile, not as a natural reaction to physical and mental conditions or crises that alert one to the fact that something is stirring so that the person himself can respond appropriately to that stirring. Such "indicating" of illness (either through fever, cough etc. and/or through grief, anger) is simply a completely normal reaction of the human being, otherwise he would not notice that it has become time to take care of himself, to give himself breaks and for him appropriately not to give in to the pressure of functioning.
We are moving towards zero tolerance with regard to illness, just as we have already done with regard to death and dying. It became/becomes a taboo.
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
Great Work.
Thank you.
:-)
You always have some good video recommendations. I am stunned by the amount you have in your "stash" :) Thank you anyway, I'll watch it probably this evening.
I would like you to come visit my newest blog entry. Seems like it needs a bit of attention in the comment-section.
Thanks for the invite, I'll take a look.
A good friend who is a teacher in a Steiner school recently made me aware of this quote in this article.
It is interesting. I have had a conversation previously with @perceptualflaws regarding an overarching agenda to create a frequency prison where universal frequencies cannot breach.
I feel that there is a way through this and it is mainly with patience.
None of this can last forever. What we all deem spiritual in this instance is not relevant. It is that our minds cannot wander because the fields of information that govern the mind are constrained.
I feel however that those that truly wish a way through will find it.
Let's see...
I included your "A Cappella" song in my latest video.
It keeps getting stuck in my head, and that gives me hope.
I'm watching it now. Some good content.
∴
The "ministers" mention the PCR test "to amplify results".
2013.
Bummer, I haven't seen this article of yours earlier.
You raise some interesting points and the way and the choice of words Rudolf Steiner is said to have used sounds irritating and like something superstitious, doesn't it? This is what irritates people.
It irritated me too, but instead of immediately going into resistance and getting upset about this form of the words chosen, I asked myself whether I would be able to provide my own translation for this and, if necessary, choose alternative expressions to put what was said into a more generally accepted context.
The thing is that an exaggeration in the first place is the appropriate stylistic device to shake people out of their habitual ways of thinking and reacting. Now this form of shaking up is a balancing act. But attention is generated and that's the thing you can work with, isn't it?
What is so astonishing is the fact that Steiner apparently ascribes such a great effect to a remedy, here called vaccination, as that it could, for instance, change a person's mental constitution and prevent spiritual enlightenment. The "modern person" thinks: "No way, nothing could do that, it's all chemicals and has nothing to do with our spirits", no?
But in modern terms, one could say that drugs (hormone preparations and antidepressants, for example) influence a person's psyche and "calm" him down, which can mean that he becomes indifferent to his own emotions and no longer has extreme emotional changes, such as strong sadness or great joy.
I know from conversations with people who have taken medication for depression that they would henceforth be in a state of egalitarianism and that because of this they would be "protected" from these feelings that are so difficult to experience. Is that good, bad?
What could be interpreted as a spiritual experience, namely to allow a so-called extreme feeling of sadness, because it expresses a human need. In particular, people suffer and grieve when those around them give them the impression that such suffering is an imposition on the community. However, the administration of medication to "keep someone quiet for their own peace of mind" can just as easily be a protective assertion by those who do not wish to deal with grief, anger, fear and other so-called negative emotions or who feel overwhelmed by them.
It is obvious to me that such things happen because people have known for a long time that they have to function, no matter how they are doing mentally (spiritually), and that the suppression of individual crises, which express themselves through illness, reflects all the more strongly on an entire society that denies that it has to function for the most part, but is not allowed to give itself time, leisure, waiting. They key word is ""non-intervention" with the so called extreme expressions of a suffering person and let him be as he feels; also not medicating. Accept his emotional state until he recovers by himself, mainly for the reason perceiving himself as accepted, respected and tolerated within his state of being. But when a human does not experience others people patience, confidence and tolerance towards his state of being, things get worse, not better.
In an article of mine I tried to cover the topic of mental disease - it has also correlations to what we experience right now in this world.
In summary, I would say that both physical and mental illness are seen as hostile, not as a natural reaction to physical and mental conditions or crises that alert one to the fact that something is stirring so that the person himself can respond appropriately to that stirring. Such "indicating" of illness (either through fever, cough etc. and/or through grief, anger) is simply a completely normal reaction of the human being, otherwise he would not notice that it has become time to take care of himself, to give himself breaks and for him appropriately not to give in to the pressure of functioning.
We are moving towards zero tolerance with regard to illness, just as we have already done with regard to death and dying. It became/becomes a taboo.
Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)
Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded
I also like Alfred Korzybski.