You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Borderless Inequality

in Deep Dives3 years ago

I am having difficulties to fit the term "socialism" into this context. When you speak of a world without borders, then to my mind, it's not about socialism but it's a form of positive anarchy.

Well, the anarchy that is my ideal is called "communism" which is a stateless, classless and moneyless society. You know, like the tribes of old. And my definition of anarchy can't work in a capitalist system as capitalism enforces class-division. Anarchy does not mean that there are no leaders and followers, by the way, but it does mean that there are no rulers and ruled.

Thanks for the book recommendation :-) I'll look into it if I find the time...

Sort:  

You are welcome.
It's worth reading. :)