Comment was not meant in terms of curation. In terms of creative output: a lot - people are writing books, some are producing their life's body of work illustration, art, painting. 100s of people are pouring their hearts in everyday, hive is a place they find friends and comfort.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
and curation is meant to reward them without asking for payment/selfish reasons in exchange
Do you remember when the ratio was different for curators / authors? Or am I imagining that? Could be tweaked again in the future? Would be a hard fork, though.
To favor authors again? Wasn't a big reason that was changed cause people would create alts to self-vote with, though?
It is a distribution problem - and alt-account self-votes still happen by proxy, I think we both are smart enough to know that - through networks of individuals - and a relationship graph will often show that - where acct 1 spends the bulk of its vp on acct 2, and its a mirror!
so self-votes still happen a lot as it is, so we should increase it?
or increase curation split vs author rewards?
Maybe go 40/40/20 and 20 goes to the DHF - which gets redistributed by merit or "Grants" to content creators who provably bring new eyeballs to hive?
Thinking out of the box.
the dhf gets enough as it is i think, doubt it ever even needed steemit's ninja stake considering we never spend more than ~16k per day with 70% of that being hbdstabilizer.
I'd encourage more use towards initiatives like posh/spendhbd and other things that benefit all hivers