With all this discussion going around on #hive about #AI use and how @hivewatchers handle it, what is the communities opinion on using AI on Hive?
--- This question was created on [reverio.io](https://reverio.io), Reverio is a question and answer platform built exclusively for Hive. Answer this question on Reverio by clicking [here](https://Reverio.io/question/influxpictures/what-is-your-opinion-on-using-ai-on-hive-).
Hi @influxpictures!
Congrats on your first question on Reverio.
Your question has received a small upvote from https://reverio.io.
We'd love to hear your feedback or any suggestions you have surrounding Reverio. You can get in touch by replying to this comment. Please consider following us on Hive to keep up to date with our latest announcements.
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @tobias-g ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
We already use AI for spelling and grammar checking. But we generally mean content generation, i.e. creating music, art, video, and text. If AI is involved, a creator must still exercise creative judgement in directing the AI and selecting the final output. However, claiming AI-generated content as one's own is terrible - at best, it's co-creation. Using AI is comparable to using stock content; too much can negatively affect quality. Nonetheless, AI allows for creating more content that might not otherwise be produced if it had to be made from scratch. The most important factors are that the content has some value, and the creator is open about what they worked on and did not.
I wrote a jumbled and rambling answer. I spent some time with ChatGPT to shorten the text and then with Grammarly to correct meanings, grammar and punctuation. I don't think anyone has a problem with this workflow.
Where there might be a problem is if I gave your question to ChatGPT and had it write the answer. In that case, how many changes and edits do I need to make before it's okay?