Because I don't have complete control over what kinds of comments get rewarded, abd I have the voting power to it directly. Voting directly means I have to read it :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Because I don't have complete control over what kinds of comments get rewarded, abd I have the voting power to it directly. Voting directly means I have to read it :)
Hmm I think the comments you vote on gets rewarded only :)
But no, you don't get to choose for how much.
Another thing is that the way you do, it doesn't "remove" anything from your post reward, but using commentrewarder does. I think it's a more spread out and fair distribution than 100% to the poster.
Oh, I noticed that it is sensitive to the weight of the vote now, so I might give it a go in the near future :)
I am not sure it is fairer. The commenters didn't create the article, but get earnings from it. This makes sense if no one can reward the comments, but o think people should also vote good comments more often too, and not just the original poster. Showing sone vote appreciation, even if low value has an impact on commenters.
I agree but with the state hive is in right now... won't happen imho.
That why I liked the initiative at first, yet I don't see much people use it anyway.
Thanks for your reply!
I will look into it more, but I think it is more suited to people who don't have enough of their own voting power.