You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Supporting the Anti-Bot Proposal: A Step Towards Addressing Community Concerns While Keeping Future Possibilities Open

in Splinterlandslast year (edited)

I can only assume you are speaking of me when you say "votes the way he wants, a no".

Unlike you @torran, I directly talked to Aly. I directly mentioned what my issues with him were, why I thought how I thought, and what I felt was important. Then I pushed for him to be heard. I encouraged him to face the community and address his perspective.

But that's not your style. You do not have courage to do that. Instead you simply make up things so you can tear down someone that worked against what you felt was more important.

Also you should get your facts straight, I still have the same problems with what was originally said, and the only thing that has happened is they have been addressed by Aly. Because I did IN FACT gave him a chance to address them. That's how grown-ups handle things. You should try it, it will work I promise.

So I don't give a shit if he changed his vote or not. That was not the point of my post or what I had a problem with. I care that he didn't listen to what 2/3rds of the community was saying, and didn't engage with us before casting a blocking vote.

So I'm happy he did engage, and I'm happy he listened. That's what I'm happy about. His vote was not an issue, the fact that he is the Head of the SPS DAO Foundation and he listened to the SPS holders was.

Too bad you are so clouded in your desire to get what you want that you can't even see when people are trying to help and support the community.

Pitiful.

Sort:  

It was actually a blanket statement speaking to the overall response from the community as witnessed throughout tavern, but thanks for the personal attack. Real stand up guy, Dave.

I just apologized for my misreading of it below. But I will say it again here. I was wrong.

And regarding the personal attack, I apologize for saying you weren't grown up for addressing me directly. That was an attack. And because I was wrong in my reading of your comment, then I definitely attacked you unfairly.

I withdraw my statements that you were not handling it in a grown up manner, assaulted your style, and questioned your courage; because you were just generalizing your frustration instead of leveling it against one person. My response was inappropriate given you were just blowing off steam in general, not directing them at a single individual.

I am sorry for this as well.

Finally you are right that my statements are not defendable. I accept that in your eyes that I wasn't a "stand up guy".

Thank you for letting me know the truth and I regret that I did read it wrong and unfairly respond.

Also... "votes the way he wants, a no," could also be read, votes the way Aly wants, a no. Reading comprehension is hard though. Sorry you felt so attacked.

I interpreted it the other way. I apologize to you for misreading who you meant when you said "he".

I was wrong and I'm sorry for my misreading it.