You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Boycott the Witness Who is Against Questioning the Vaccine

"was provided with no explanation for this flag"
"infringes people's freedom of expression without explanation"

Both of these statements, are in my eyes incorrect.

There's no explanation needed for flags unless its a childish flag war. But flags in them self's are not required to have an explanation attached to it.

The last statement is without a doubt incorrect, reducing your "temp" pay rewards has no effect on your freedom of expression.

Sort:  

So you think i am more inspired to blog now?

An explanation could serve as a learning experience for both parties?

True, but not needed.

We should take a poll?

If you agree an explanation is in order, vote this comment.
If not, vote the comment above.

@antisocialist lol i noticed that such poll most times do get more upvotes from those who are a fan of a particular user and do not care about the subject that is involved,they just want to show their loyalty to their favourite person.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

If you go look at the comments section, you'll notice the only comments are from people who disagree with me at the top. That's because these people are soliciting bad science, I'm also curious to what extent online harassment would involve a downvote, you don't have to use words to be charged with harassment online.

Only reason I put it that way is because the top two comments literally missed the entire point I was trying to bring up with the boycott, being that they have a problem with you questioning the vaccine and they're encouraging The Mask which is based on bad science, and obviously didn't work with the virus spreading into all countries.

being that they have a problem with you questioning the vaccine and they're encouraging The Mask which is based on bad science, and obviously didn't work with the virus spreading into all countries.

@phusionphil i guess they are just been ignorant..


Posted via proofofbrain.io

I would go 1 step further and say they are encroaching peoples rights and freedoms with coercion to modify their body with bad science. That is disgusting and far worse than ignorance.

It's encouraging crimes against humanity.

Upvotes or downvotes? 😁

Explanations are nice. As a content creator, engagement is always a treat from your readers. We just can't claim to be entitled to it

So no, not in order, but cool if someone feels like it. Just like leaving a rating on something when someone buys from amazon. Sometimes they explain, sometimes they don't. Most don't. The few the do can be pretty helpful

I have rated your comment a 3 out of a possible 3.

@foxon but sir just like you said some people just feel like flagging a post and they might not have any sensible reason why they did that,don't you think such attitude should be condemned??that is more like a dictatorship type of blogging platform...


Posted via proofofbrain.io

How are ratings from -100 to -1 dictatorship while ratings from 1 to 100 are not?

It's just a rating. Often people don't have a sensible reason why they rate a particular post or product what they do. Maybe it gave them a feeling they can't describe. Maybe it had to do with the blogger's hairstyle 🤷‍♂

@foxon alright i have heard you


Posted via proofofbrain.io

A good poll is good but the poll will be more effective if it is done on a neutral ground and not on this particular post.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

we have already had many polls of this nature, as I have followed your antics for longer than even I knew... (minds). But perhaps a modern poll with all parties involved could serve a purpose.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

as I have followed your antics for longer than even I knew...

Did you cross reference my personas?

But perhaps a modern poll with all parties involved could serve a purpose.

Nah, it was a shameless vote grab.

I do think that explanation are in order, though.
They serve to make the community consensus more palatable, imo.
Since we have no rulers, but we do have rules.

Yeah, I was cross-referencing.

@snon was very reasonable to discuss this with.

@rishi556 "my money, my vote"

@foxon seems to have some internal conflict and that where the speculation is disorienting me.

The record is now set straight.

All hail, freedom!

"There's no explanation needed for flags unless its a childish flag war. But flags in them self's are not required to have an explanation attached to it. "

@chronocrypto

Please what can be considered as childish flags??what you believe is a childish flag might be what someone else believe is a sensible and matured flag,so i think that is why it is not a bad idea to explain why you flagged a post...i have seen people on the platform that flagged a post simply because someone did not support their opinion...if everyone starts flagging each other because they give different opinion then who will be stay on the platform??we cannot always agree with something ALL the time...


Posted via proofofbrain.io

"childish flag war" Id think it is both parties flagging each other.

Oh now i understand what you mean by childish flagging


Posted via proofofbrain.io

@chronocrypto

That could make people to start getting scared of expressing their opinions because when they do that they could possibly get flagged by people,is that not a wrong approach?


Posted via proofofbrain.io