Mike Adams is coming around to your way of thinking... has apologized to people.
EDIT: I'll give you a chance to publish an "I told you so" as he does have some good info in that article.
If you don't plan on doing anything let me know as the info in that article is worth writing a post about.
Hahaha yeh I saw that and frankly he's a bit late to jump on the bandwagon, plenty of us told him, I told him years ago. I've been awol for a week because my keyboard broke so have had to just listen and watch the world going round in circles. It's been quite fun just watching for a change. Couldn't log into Hive at all. If you want to do a piece on his article go ahead. I'm just carrying on in my own way. He's too far behind now for me to be bothered with him.
Interesting text you linked. Thank you.
I wonder though, if the suspicion that people are being killed with vaccinations doesn't also feed into the narrative one is trying to defend against.
Is it not the case that the conviction of gaining control over the biological function of the body on a genetic or "nano-level" can be questioned? How is this control possible in such a complex organism that is exposed to countless influences, not only material but also mental?
I wonder if behind the idea that not only the C. virus is a hoax, but also that the injections that form a so-called spike protein is also one. And I wonder if someone who is interested in both scenarios in his assertiveness regarding people's fears basically welcomes both scenarios, as long as they serve his interests directly or indirectly. The whole issue has acquired far too much focus and energy, how can it be put back into Pandora's box? Once we believe that the possibilities of genetic intervention are taking place in the way we are presented with, what follows?
I think it follows that we are afraid and that the already gaping separation between one human being and another continues to happen. We make enemies of each other and fight the battle of the others who, how then, merely have to watch? While we ordinary people make each other's lives miserable, get bogged down in debates, distrust each other, isn't that exactly what seems to be achieved by those we harshly criticise?
How can we still find each other in this confusion?
While one feels motivated to believe that the C. virus is a hoax, does one feel inclined to believe that the ingredients in the injections are of the kind that are capable of manipulating us on a genetic and organic level?
I believe neither the one nor the other. That one is able to realise genetic interventions by means of protein spikes, I attribute to the will to believe that man has unlimited potential in terms of biological possibilities to intervene in the human organism.
Insofar as I think about it more deeply, I ask myself how such fine and targeted control can be achieved. In my view, such a thing would presuppose an omniscience, an infallibility in the knowledge of what the effects of such manipulation would be.
... We don't really know the cause of illness, even if we think we do and draw on corresponding answers, which nevertheless cannot be mono-causalities.
In an effort to convince those who are not considering one scenario or the other, what do we achieve? Those who believe in the omnipotence of biological interventions and that they can be used to augment or make oneself resistant to disease may not fear these treatments, may even welcome them, but do they not feel hostility towards those who question it all? No matter how you spin it, in the end I always see the rift that these scenarios create.
I will say, however, that I take the article positively in so far as it clears up what we have been led to believe for the last year and a half.
I have no real answers and time will tell if people will die en masse from the injections. I tend to think that this won't happen. I hope that I won't be wrong.
If neither side acts as though they have the right to FORCE the other side then we can find each other. As long as either side thinks they can force the other there will not likely be peace.
A bigger article dropped yesterday. Actually a couple. I gave the info to @active-truth and am waiting to see if she wants to write about it. Some of the people that are out there and active in the world are gradually coming around to some of her perspectives.
If she doesn't write anything on it, I probably will. I wanted to give her the first shot at it though since it is squarely in her area of expertise so to speak.
Yes, that's right, forcing is not the way to go. We see and feel how it is to be forced, don't we?
Yesterday I heard again in a Corona Committee interview about the psychology of the whole matter, where hypnosis has been cited as an explanation of the phenomenon that keeps people trapped in fear. Feeling safe again was given as an argument that people are willing not only to force others into something, but are willing to harm themselves in order to regain the feeling of safety. I think that is true. Man is a strange creature....
Yes, I would be curious to read an article about this and would be happy if you or active truth published something.
Greetings.