amazing work, reads like a science paper ( which is a good thing).
I had a question on alt count but you answered it ! Ones question why 2 POB / HBD? why not say 10% of total potential value? Just curious where the value came from
One other concern is "bad behaviour" , I know you left it open because limits can creat loopholes( I assume so anyway) but it felt very open and i was not sure what it could cover.
Had to come up with a value. A percentage would be much harder to monitor. The 2 POB / 2 HBD amount seemed small enough to keep it from being a major issue. I suspect we will see a lot of these de minimus downvotes from folks who are heavy on the pro-downvote side -- probably even significant auto-downvoting. I don't envision that being too problematic, but these guidelines (and the thresholds) can always be amended if they are found unsuitable.
We had to get started somewhere. This is the first step. The next step would be to develop community-based definitions of other 'bad behavior' (beyond the four objective measures included in this proposal).
Thanks for that and thought both those reasons would be the "why" I think the "bad behaviour " peice will be more contentious then the downvote rules to be honest because you could technically write the bad behaviour rules so you can still carry on your sense of justice
I see where you're coming from. Bad behavior will need to be addressed and defined before taking action. It's the reason for trost's need for a consensus: more than one person defines that behavior and then determines that a DV is needed.
If I feel your post is over-rewarded, per his proposal, I just can't DV it alone or suffer the consequences. More people need to get together and decide. Given the feel of the proposal the decision is probably to occur through a vote similar to this post.
Good take. Looking back at his proposal I don't think there is any option for feeling a post is over voted unless that falls under "bad behaviour "
Correct. The proposal is a good first step, but it's certainly not all inclusive. We would have to define these "bad behaviors". I'm putting together a list of bad behaviors I've learned about from HDR and HW to discuss in the future. I'm sure there are people in this very comment section that can provide a list by memory.
The importance of the proposal is that it makes communicating them a priority, first. It gives the community time to understand and voice their opinion.
Agree and look forward to seeing that list