"this is a crowdfund post without high quality content - part 1"
"this is a crowdfund post without high quality content - part 2"
"this is a crowdfund post without high quality content - part 3"
"this is a crowdfund post without high quality content - part 4"
"this is a crowdfund post without high quality content - part 5"
high quality content is much harder to create
I dont see how its any different to a meme, photos, or simple games.
High quality content is needed, however not all high quality content can be well rewarded, and so naturally lower quality content is going to slip in too as a volume rather than quality way of posting. For the most part things seem to be rewarded fairly, I suspect crowd funding would not be a highly rewarded post anyway.
Like I said, if this is allowed, I will create a post for curation crowdfunding which is essentially votebuying, or anything else that is abusive but looks harmless, then get a ton of votes from my acquaintances. I will be succesful in doing so.
However, if you think I am as likely to succeed in being ill intended by posting a bunch of low-quality or zero content, gif-filled posts, then we disagree with each other's opinion and that's all there is to it.
It goes without saying that large stakeholders who don't give a crap about POB will stop curating content completely and will start upvoting their acquaintance's frequent crowdfunding posts.
Large stake holders should always give a crap about pob or whats the point in having a large stake?
Self voting, multi accounts and circle jerking is always going to be an issue. some get auto votes from curation trails ect.
But I can understand where you are coming from.