Lol was he mad that I didn't warn him and provide him with a ToS for this decentralized blockchain lol
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Lol was he mad that I didn't warn him and provide him with a ToS for this decentralized blockchain lol
DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD WISH THEM TO DO UNTO YOU
What goes around comes around, unless the author was questioning the rewards pool, I never downvote a good debate even if I disagree.
i thought you said you downvoted this post because you disagreed.
It's not a debate, and if it was the formating in the article didn't resemble a debate, I disagree with the status quo in all contents of its use.
Ok, so you had a "difference of opinion" and you were unwilling to "debate" even though you were having a "conversation" about that "difference of opinion" ?
What's the quantifiable distinction between a conversation about a difference of opinion and a "debate" ?
logical fallacies would be considered unacceptable in a debate, a difference of opinion could be 2 children fighting over who can eat the most cookies before telling mom on each other.
I've seen quite a few formal debates, and logical fallacies usually win the day.
For example, an appeal to popularity wins this,