Hello Hivians! I am astounded over the resonance I got for my post about stoicism. 50 upvotes! I think this is personal record! Thank you so very much for this feedback, it motivates so much! I even think to do a series about stoicism, but I dont want to flood content as well. We will see how things develop! This time though I been thinking about AI and how it is changing our world.
Imagine a world where artificial intelligence has evolved so far that machines can perform tasks once thought to be exclusively human. They can analyze data, make decisions, even compose music and write literature. But can they truly "think"? René Descartes' famous dictum, Cogito ergo sum, or "I think, therefore I am," raises intriguing questions about the nature of consciousness and identity in machines.
The phrase "Cogito ergo sum" has long been a cornerstone of philosophic thought, encapsulating Descartes' belief that the act of thinking is the only indisputable evidence for one's own existence. For humans, this concept implies an intrinsic link between consciousness and self-awareness. But what about AI? If a machine can simulate human cognition—solving problems, learning from experience, and making decisions—does that mean it "thinks"? Or is thinking something inherently unique to biological entities? I would love to get your take in the comment section! :)
Artificial Intelligence currently operates on complex algorithms and neural networks designed to mimic(!) human thought processes. Can these algorithms ever truly think? Or are they merely sophisticated calculators, performing operations based on predefined rules and patterns? The question of whether AI can achieve consciousness—and whether it would even be recognizable as such—remains a hotly debated topic among philosophers, cognitive scientists, and computer engineers.
One school of thought suggests that machines could theoretically develop something akin to consciousness if they were equipped with the right programming and computational power. Proponents point to advancements in deep learning and AI capable of creative tasks like composing music or creating art. But skeptics argue that AI might never achieve true self-awareness, regardless of how advanced it becomes. And here is my take: altough it mimics the process, it can never achieve the real deal. You cannot 'create' consciousness, it is eminent in the universe. I consider myself to be an -idealist- ( in the philosophical meaning ) - realizing that there is first consciousness as the 'ur'-reason, matter is a product of consciousness working. Many believe it is the other way around. I also could fill a whole series with that topic. I want to repeat that I also do not want to spam haha, but nvm
As we continue to push the boundaries of what machines can do, we are also confronting deeper philosophical questions about the nature of consciousness and identity. Can a machine designed to think ever truly be conscious in the way Descartes described? Or is human thought something fundamentally different from whatever processes AI might undergo? The quest for answers remains ongoing, but it's clear that as AI evolves, so too will our understanding of what it means to "think." And you just read my take on this!
Thank you so much for your time and catch you in the next one!
Image credit: stable diffusion
Congratulations @s0phos! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 400 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts: