I think the tl;dr was that bernie was downvoting her for one or another reason, as he usually would some people, things escalated to where he started calling her names, some other random accounts, most likely socks took it even further and cryptofinally used the worst examples to build her battle against hive. When she was told that she could mute accounts from the front-ends, that she wouldn't have to read them nor would people checking her blogs see them unless they went all the way down and unmuted the comments she started instead saying things like the governance needs to get involved to block bernie or something stupid. As people were trying to then tell her that if she was bringing value to Hive and kept promoting it many other whales would stand up and counter the downvotes if they felt like she was worth it, apparently the clout of being against the whole chain was worth it more for her than actually ignoring the small issue of 1-2 users downvoting and being vulgar.
Saw an interview she did about Hive on @crypt0's youtube a while back if you want some to roll your eyes over the whole thing even more:
Thanks for the background.
I kind of feel like downvotes can be a good test of someone's understanding of decentralization, where once they call for governance to get involved, they indicate they are more concerned about their personal experience than that of the entire network that enables it. This is why second-layer apps are so important, because they can give the experience, whilst the chain can be "free".
THis is the approach of a social media influencer for sure :)
https://peakd.com/hive/@cryptofinally/your-slack-has-more-than-one-leak
blocktrades has a good rundown in this comment section
She really just ignored 80% of what BT was saying! :D
The crypto influencer is strong in her.
Sweet. This is worth a read then :)