Part 6/15:
Richard ties this to the emotional states of the activists, emphasizing that the left operates on a moral emotional framework. For them, emotional energy equates to moral righteousness. Repetition of certain moral stories provides vent for frustration and anger, serving as psychological defense mechanisms. Both recognize that this emotionalism has a double-edged nature: while it fuels cohesion, it also exhausts resources, leaving the movement vulnerable.
They mention that the Unabomber's critique is surprisingly insightful—highlighting how emotional intensity is intertwined with moral self-perception. In this context, Sam suggests that the left’s emotional circuits are 'burned-out,' which weakens their overall effectiveness and leaves them in a state of strategic limbo.