Part 9/13:
Antar criticizes the political politicization of investigations, noting that high-profile figures like Trump push the narrative of persecution, although the real cases—such as James’s purported mortgage fraud—are rooted in substantive forensic evidence. He points out that grand juries, even in Democratic-majority areas, have found sufficient cause to indict her, emphasizing that justice is rooted in fact, not political allegiances.
He surmises that authorities are likely to continue building cases through superseding indictments, potentially involving other properties and financial transactions. He warns that cooperation from involved parties may be necessary, and resistance could lead to further legal trouble for those implicated.