Part 3/11:
Adding a layer of irony, it has been revealed that during his political career in Granada, Steel supported tax breaks for oil and gas corporations—an obvious contradiction to his current rhetoric advocating for green energy. This stark hypocrisy raises questions about the true motives behind his alarmist stance. Many commentators suggest that such figures are more driven by political or ideological agendas than by genuine scientific concern.
This pattern of duplicity is not unique to Steel; it underscores a recurring theme among some climate advocates who, despite vocally supporting green initiatives, previously endorsed policies favoring fossil fuels. They might now find themselves in a conflicting position, either hiding their past commitments or redefining their narrative.