Part 15/19:
The company’s associations, especially with law enforcement and immigration agencies, drew fire from progressive circles. Karp’s outspoken defense of border control and his opposition to certain law enforcement practices — like predictive policing—highlight his pragmatic approach: balancing ideological principles with operational needs.
The controversy intensified over Palantir’s work during the Trump administration, especially regarding immigration enforcement. Meanwhile, Thiel’s public support of Trump, combined with Palantir’s work on sensitive security issues, blurred the lines between corporate ethics and political allegiance.