Part 11/12:
Legal scholars and politicians have voiced concern over the sweeping nature of the court’s ruling. Granting automatic asylum rights to all residents of Gaza challenges traditional notions of sovereignty and border control. Countries have historically retained the right to evaluate asylum applications based on individual circumstances, security assessments, and national interests.
The decision risks adding further strain to European immigration systems already grappling with integration and security concerns. It also sets a precedent that could encourage mass migration under the guise of wartime persecution, potentially altering the demographic and political landscape of European nations.