Part 3/12:
The discussion then turned toward recent international events like COP 29, where Australia’s pavilion was criticized for conducting a Welcome to Country ceremony in another country—a move deemed inappropriate by the panelists. They argued that such gestures, while well-intentioned domestically, could be perceived as disingenuous or confusing when performed abroad. The panel concluded that, as the Australian ambassador abroad, the prime minister should adhere to a consistent and straightforward display of national symbolism.