Part 7/11:
The conversation takes a political turn when discussing the motivations behind withholding certain documents or selectively releasing them. Some argue that political calculus—such as timing around elections or protecting allies—drives decisions on what gets disclosed and when.
They speculate that the “hot potato” nature of the case is exploited for political gain, with critics on both sides using the narrative to attack opponents. The Democrats’ stance of “full disclosure,” including naming individuals linked to Jeffrey Epstein, is contrasted with Republican caution about redactions, prompting questions about how each side’s criticisms could evolve depending on what information becomes public.