Part 6/10:
Despite the apology, many in the community remained skeptical. Critics argued that a public apology could not erase the damage done, citing that the choice to wear the hat and the subsequent response showcased a misjudgment of the community’s sensitivities. Moreover, some expressed concern that this controversy could have tangible impacts, such as reduced interest in Splitgate 2—a game that is free to play but includes microtransactions.
Interestingly, it was noted that the game's player base had already shown signs of decline after the incident, with some speculating that the fallout might deter fans from supporting the game further. The key point for many was the perception that the development team bowed to social pressures, compromising their integrity and originality.