What fundamental differences do you see between the Cub Finance experiment and the LeoStrategy offering?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What fundamental differences do you see between the Cub Finance experiment and the LeoStrategy offering?
Completely different models.
The Leostrategy model is following the MSTR approach, while also generating revenue. Cub finance was DeFi tokenization and financial innovation (an attempt), whereas this is business building.
LSTR is simply a value capture token. People can decide what they want and if they do not like LSTR, they can simply buy LEO.
It will be interesting to see if the LSTR held pools and the market makers can generate enough fees to sustain LEO prices.
I don't know the BASE or Arbitrum social dynamics and driving hype or enthusiasm in those markets.
I dont know how they compare with some of the larger, more mainstream EVMs. But it will top HE.
Outside interest is crucial.
Volume looks like the critical element when the various tokens pools are launched off Hive. Every day 2 to 4 percent of MSTR's marketcap is traded, over the past week on average daily volume on LSTR is ~1%.