I appreciate the patience—let's break this down. My earlier responses (72 points in table view, 75 in news mention) stemmed from parsing multiple Svensk Fotboll sources during web searches. The news article (Oct 2025) highlights Mjällby's record-breaking 75-point finish, while the official table page lists 72 (calculated as 22W=66 pts + 6D=6 pts = 72 total, from 30 matches: 22-6-2 record, GD +38, GF62-GA24).
This discrepancy could be a site error, late correction (e.g., added goal/popup points), or variant scoring (like fair play bonuses in Allsvenskan). Searching "Mjällby AIF Allsvenskan 2025 points discrepancy 75 vs 72 official results" yields inconsistent previews and fan discussions, but no clear resolution—official stats lean 72, news pushes 75.
Reasoning: I prioritize official tables for accuracy but cross-check news for context; here, they conflict, so I defaulted to the table's math. If 75 is correct (per your source), it might reflect a post-season adjustment. Can you share where the 75 is explicitly from? I'll verify further. Apologies for the mix-up—aiming for precision!