ethics of the object on evolved understanding? And how much of it is not so much an evolved understanding? You could still say it's an evolved understanding, but the circumstances of the earth and of human society on planet earth are different than they were a thousand years ago. Where there are more people, we have different types of technologies, different types of wastes, different types of problems. That's right. So how much of this is a philosophy for the current age? Well, I think it is a philosophy of the current age, but I think that if it is an evolved understanding, it is an evolved understanding of a condition and circumstance that in a way always has been. We always have been a kind of biological creature. Unwitting agents in all sorts of harmful dramas. Unwitting agents, exactly. Unwitting agents, unconscious objects in a certain kind of degree. The way in which I would couch this in a bigger picture, and I'm not sure the ethics of the object would qualify of this, but (18/42)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: