have been one is something that I made part of the story, which I think is... And why? Because it shows the corrosive, effective, active measures. If we can't explain something, then of course immediately we begin to doubt and potentially see foreign interference. That in itself is part of the history of this information. How does that relate to the accusations of Russian hacking in the US election? Yeah, so sorry, I'm jumping back and forth between old examples and new... Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt you. I only mentioned that. We can go back to it. I only mentioned that because our reaction to that story was so integral to the effect in this of any campaign and that's why I brought it up. But we can go back. I'm sorry, go ahead. No, no, I mean, it's a great question you're raising and indeed there's a parallel. You know, when I wrote this book, I became at some point quite concerned that I could become ultimately what is often called a useful idiot and it's just literally a (20/43)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: