which is that individuation, though it was something that was that evolved as a sort of an adaptive way of interfacing with the world, has at this stage become a kind of malignancy. No, no, no, no, no. Let me try to introduce a little bit of specificity into this as well. The individuation and the sense of individuation that I'm speaking of, the kind of would identify as a kind of particular, at this point, has become a kind of potentially rather malignant trait of some aspects of Western political culture is not the capacity for sapiens, is not the capacity for a kind of projective or futural or speculative intersubjectivity. That might identify with this in the cave scenario. That the scenario of the kind of projective intersubjectivity or projective interobjectivity is closer to what I was talking about the ethics of the object. However, what I'm speaking to in the book about the kind of crisis of individuation or kind of malignant forms of individuation, in many cases, a kind of (30/42)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: