This is a question occupied in a lot of hiver's mind. This is difficult to answer. Some like to upvote themself but some do not like to upvote themself.
People think upvoting ourself is selfish but can you tell me the name of a man without ego. It will be ok if you do not upvote yourself too much. 10% selfvote should be allowed.

image from Geralt
But I want to make a boundary on this topic. I heard a sentence from someone that we should not upvote ourself because we already get 50% curation reward from upvoting other people's post. I did not know we can get more than 50% by upvoting our post.. I will check this out. If someone comment on my post I will upvote his comment and my replies so I may get the answer I need.
But there are two conditions to decide this matter.
- If your HP is too low you should not upvote yourself.
- If your HP is decent you can upvote yourself.
If your HP is too low you can not get much money from your upvote. If you upvote other's people post you may have a chance to get a vote back. This is good for you if your partner's vote has value higher than you.
But if your upvote worth a lot you can upvote yourself. Because by upvoting your self you can convert HP to HBD. If you upvote on other people's post you will only get HP. If you upvote yourself you will also get some HBD. This is nice if you want to get some quick buck.

from TheDigitalArtist
This is what I think. I will be glad if you write you thought on my post.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Interesting idea on the upvoting yourself to get HBD. I never thought of that.
This is because currently HBD is printing out instead of Hive.
The idea is to use your vote on others and help them grow whilst you grow from curation on that vote. In the past we had many users upvoting themselves as it was a time based vote gaming the system. This actually harmed curation as those that voted for themselves lost plenty of support. If everyone started self voting it would do more harm than good and is that simple. Curation is what keeps Hive going and you start to play with that and you will lose plenty of users. There are no short cuts to growing on Hive and you have only been here a short time and think this is alright. Just giving my point of view and the choice is yours.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I got your point. But 100% selflessness is hard to achieve. Sometimes you may need HBD or sometimes you may need attention for your post. Like 5% to 10% ego and 90 to 95% selflessness would be more flexible. If we can make 100% selflessness that would be better.
But a question is should we stick at 100% selflessness.
By the way I did not upvote myself since the time I can not remember.
I don't get the ego bit as this is a long journey and if you are concerned about not receiving rewards then all you do is work harder. This has been the biggest challenge I have ever undertaken and it takes years to get things moving as you need to build your followers and foundation first. When I first started out I voted on my own posts as I didn't understand the value of the vote and how to use it as a growth tool. By supporting others the rewards in return will be higher as you are being active within the community. Just keep growing and you will see things change.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
PIZZA Holders sent $PIZZA tips in this post's comments:
@yintercept(1/5) tipped @beyondhorizonmm (x1)
Please vote for pizza.witness!
This post has been manually curated by @bhattg from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.
Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating to @indiaunited. We share 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators.
Here are some handy links for delegations: 100HP, 250HP, 500HP, 1000HP.
Read our latest announcement post to get more information.
Please contribute to the community by upvoting this comment and posts made by @indiaunited.
I like your posts with the seemingly controversial topics. For me I see self votes as reward farming. If all the whales are self voting themselves then there'll be no need to curate others. Moreover if some people have a big vote then they'll no longer need to worry about the quality of their posts they can just write anything and vote it and end up in trending page.
!1UP
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
Don´t agree, even in contrary. The more HP I have accumulated the more I try to produce quality content. And I can upvote all my posts and there is still enough voting power left to upvote many other posts.
You are an example of someone who self votes responsibly. Sadly, not everyone will self vote responsibly
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
Am with you on that, rather upvote others than myself that way we spread the wealth amongst ourselves, I like you whales example.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Different people have different thoughts. Some may want to stick with 100% selflessness and some may not. There are many arguments in this matter.
Hive is the combination of investment and social media. Even a social media allow self vote. No need to say the investor part.
But Hive walks a different way and frown upon self vote.
I am not upvoting myself but ......
Self voting is tell how good is yourself to others. We should not do this but sometimes it needed because people do not notice how good we are.
That is the reason why candidate are making speech in front of people.
What they did in the past and what will they do in the future.
You have received a 1UP from @b0s!
@leo-curator, @ctp-curator, @vyb-curator, @pob-curator, @neoxag-curatorAnd they will bring !PIZZA 🍕
Learn more about our delegation service to earn daily rewards. Join the family on Discord.
Self upvote is OK, because if you are not convinced that your own posts deserve an upvote, who else should be then? Also I invested several ten thousand dollars in this platform, so I take the freedom to try to get back as much of my investment as possible. If you want to forbid self upvotes, this is not in light with the freedom of the blockchain, and it would be an investment killer. But we need more people investing in Hive!
Thanks for your comment. I got your point. If you invest ten thousand dollar and get nothing but only HP. In final day you will have to power down your HP and sell them. I think this is worser than self voting.
I'd rather upvote others than myself, spreading the wealth kind of.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Thanks for your comment and your generosity.
You are most welcome
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yay! 🤗
Your content has been boosted with Ecency Points, by @beyondhorizonmm.
Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!
Support Ecency
Vote for new Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more
as regards this topic , one might want to argue that if you don’t see value in what you’re putting out why do you think others will value it ?
Be that as it may , as self upvotes might somewhat seem appealing I feel it will water down the structure of the ecosystem.
YES! I believe you should be able to upvote yourself however it should be limited to once MAYBE twice a day while the rest is used elsewhere. You invested time, money and resources and made the decision to power up your hive so you get to do with it what you want. Upvoting your own quality work is a great way to give it a little kick and get it noticed.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I also agree with you. You can upvote 10 times with 100% voting power. If I upvote one to myself and 9 to others would be ok I think.
Congratulations @beyondhorizonmm! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
Just reflecting based on real-world voting. Though the two spheres are different because one is political and the other is technological-monetary, one can argue that the analogy isn't applicable. However, when it comes to voting, the first thing that comes to my mind is politics. Are political candidates not allowed to vote for themselves?
It depends on specific tribes. If the tribes' rules don't allow such self-vote, then don't do it or don't tag that tribe if you are self-voting your posts. If I see token issuers voting on their posts, is it wrong then to follow them?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I got your point. I also need to consider about tags. Tags are also important.
Interesting idea from you Mr horizonmmm...I have been having that same problem for a while, I heard I couldn't upvote my post but when I joined a particular curation trail,I was upvoted by the community and it shows my own upvote too because I followed the community curation trail, I think I understand your point horizonmmm, thanks for clearing my thoughts on This 🥂🥂🥂🥂🥂
Posted using Neoxian City
Yes. The same thing happen to me. Previously I followed Dragon's Sir trail. So I upvoted myself. Now I leave the trail. I now support the people from City and friend from myanmar. I also did not forget someone who support me.
Well done Mr horizonmmm 💥💥💥💥 thanks for sharing this knowledge ❤️💥
Well, I asked this question few months ago in our newbies initiative program and I was told that it is frowned upon in hive but someone with a low voting power might not be a big problem.
What is [love voting power]?
That was a typo error..
I meant "low voting power"