idk, if third party get's one semi big online person that gets really interested in the possibilities of the chain (personal community, option of making a token that you can distribute how ever, owning the community...) then it could be valuable because the fanbase would stay.
twitter shilling gets people making accounts but we must understand that it is hard learning curve. and when they make few posts with no idea what are they doing (entering no communities) and getting no feedback, a lot just quit.
my thought is that you should focus on making connections and finding those people, and we should support those tweets. When you reply on someone's tweet and you get 50-100 likes on it i feel it is more effective the all of us spamming that tweet with hive.
I mean i know nothing about twitter, i am there for a while and have like 300 followers so :D
When you think long term, The community driven marketing can sustain itself without further funding. The relationship that our stakeholders can built with the wider crypto community will become extremely valuable in the near future.
We've tried so many different ways to shill hive on Twitter. Stella gave up with the HIVE marketing and I don't know why, CryptoFinally got kicked out and theycallmedan's account got suspended. There was an opportunity for our community work together with Charles Hoskinson of Cardano and we couldn't capitalise on it. Call to actions have very little impact.
What I learned is that, there is no one our community come forward and represent HIVE on Twitter to start building that relationship with other crypto people. So I decided to become that person and taking massive steps towards bringing actual investors/partnership to HIVE.
Time for me to rewrite a detailed proposal and give our HIVE stakeholders an opportunity to really see my vision with community driven marketing.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta