mostly agree
However got a couple of unclear ideas
I love the idea of getting paid in a token issued by the DAO I would be working for , that is great if its value keeps stable o raises ,but what about if the token value depreciates itself ? many people now work for a fixed income , would they accept the risk?
Second ,At least in my country I find the government controlling extremely the labour money flow .I would say that forcing companies to use workforce as commodity
p.ej: if a company owner gives an extra payment to a employee out of the control of the tax agency , the employee could later call tax agency and the boss would get fined
Also people easily get envy when they see somebody earning more money than they
So if u have 100 people earning 1000$ , you would have 100 workers/voters feeling neutral about their economical l status
If u have 90 person earning 1000$ and 10 earning 1500$ , you may end up with 90 angry voters
Guess governments hate the idea people earnings go out of their control , at least in my country
Out of this points . brilliant article as usual
Market prices go up and they go down. Of course, if it does go down there is that risk. The individual would be free to sell the token if he or she desired. However, you raised the concept of "income", negating to focus upon the ownership aspect.
If one wants to sell the token, that is his or her right. However, all benefits of having stake are immediately negated.
As for governments, they are not part of the equation. They cannot handle anything that is decentralized. A DAO, by definition, is outside of the control of any government. Look at the DAO on Hive: no government can tough what is distributed in payouts to the proposals that the community decides to fund.
That is where they are going to run into issues. A true DAO causes government impotency. It is only those entities that have centralization which are masked as DAOs which have issues.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta