It would be very hard to get all LBI token holders to vote on each proposal every 2 weeks but much easier to get more people to vote on 5-6 purposes at the same time every 3 months.
I fully agree with that.
Also the 6 months cycle looks good to me. However, that can also be changed on the go by submitting the new model to voting. Just my two cents.
@silverstackeruk's focus is on asset management and when we get a gaming team, they will only be concerned about gaming for LBI.
Can you tell me more about this gaming thing? I guess I missed that part.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
yes a new model could be voted in for sure.
And gaming was an example to show that each team will focus on their own tasks. The content team produce content, gaming team focuses on gaming, etc,
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
:) I figured that much. Let me clarify my question. How is LBI going to be implicated in gaming? What does that mean?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
LBI can fund the start up in Hive games that provide a return.
If we get teams together who are willing to play the games and succeed, then we can look at funding those ventures.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Thanks for the explanation, sounds great!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta