You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Obligatory CUB Post

in LeoFinance3 years ago

There is some likelihood that it will. It depends on how it's implemented and then how well it's promoted. It seems to me that a very small portion of the committed LEO community have previously been involved in Defi on Ethereum, so they're not really the target market for the bridge to be widely adopted. Will that community be successful at promoting the bridge into the rest of Defi users?
If the bridge can support a wider range of Defi tokens than Binance bridge supports then it would have a higher degree of utility, but supporting a wide range of tokens means vaulting the supported tokens on both sides of the bridge... so it's capital intensive. That may be a future use for the CUB dens, though? Again a lot depends on their implementation and I haven't seen the specs.

Sort:  

Thanks for the answer! I guess we will find out then :)

Posted using Dapplr