I've heard that AI will tell you what it thinks you want to know, especially if it can't find the answer to the question you're asking. You have to specifically direct it to only go off factual evidence if you want to avoid it doing that. There's also the fact that it's basically learnt from what people have put online over the years, which can be contradictory or outdated. It's for this reason that I'll always check the articles themselves rather than relying on the AI summary. Quite often the articles don't give the evidence that the summary is claiming.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Oh absolutely. As I said, fact check. I'm not using it for rocket science or to parrot back to people eg the AI review said 😆. Just as a starting point or a quick summary.
The funniest thing I've read is that AI is sentient because it feels things, because that's what AI said. Also because it stroked the guy's ego so much that he thought it must be truly intelligent. NB This was coming from a guy on Hive we both know. It killed me.
I think that one of the goals of the creators of AI was to see it reach a point where people couldn't tell that it wasn't a real person that they were talking to. That said, maybe that's not that hard. 😜😆