You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: AI Is Already Eating Wikipedia

in LeoFinance2 days ago (edited)

Why would I even go to Wiki when I can just ask AI, is the question! Can't recall last time I went and read a wiki page. With AI you can ask follow up questions.

I love by the premise that if it seems too incredible to be true, fact check. Even AI. And if I'm going to repeat the info publicly, the same. But quick info for day to day life or to fulfil basic curiosity, like who was such and such, an AI review does the job.

Sort:  

I've heard that AI will tell you what it thinks you want to know, especially if it can't find the answer to the question you're asking. You have to specifically direct it to only go off factual evidence if you want to avoid it doing that. There's also the fact that it's basically learnt from what people have put online over the years, which can be contradictory or outdated. It's for this reason that I'll always check the articles themselves rather than relying on the AI summary. Quite often the articles don't give the evidence that the summary is claiming.

Oh absolutely. As I said, fact check. I'm not using it for rocket science or to parrot back to people eg the AI review said 😆. Just as a starting point or a quick summary.

The funniest thing I've read is that AI is sentient because it feels things, because that's what AI said. Also because it stroked the guy's ego so much that he thought it must be truly intelligent. NB This was coming from a guy on Hive we both know. It killed me.

I think that one of the goals of the creators of AI was to see it reach a point where people couldn't tell that it wasn't a real person that they were talking to. That said, maybe that's not that hard. 😜😆