Does Your Job Beat Unemployment?

in LeoFinance3 years ago

image.png

How much do you really have to make to beat unemployment and kid credits?

In this video, I run through some of the analysis of that question. Of course, it varies by state. It will also vary on whether or not the feds are kicking additional money on top of the state benefits at any given time.

Bottom line, a lot.

Link to data source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/unemployment-benefits-by-state

Transcript

How Much Do You Have to Earn to Beat Unemployment?

So I had a interesting little conversation with somebody on a discord server earlier today. And apparently they got a letter from the IRS, informing them about the, what they're calling, what he's calling backdoor UBI. So UBI is universal basic income. But what he's talking about is the the child tax credit and the way that's changed with the American rescue plan.

[00:00:21] So if you haven't seen him in my previous material on it the American rescue plan, one of the provisions is that the child tax credit is being changed. One it's going from $2,000 up to $3,000 to it's. If your kid is under six, it's actually going to 3,600, three it's fully refundable instead of partially refundable, meaning that even if you don't owe any taxes whatsoever, you.

[00:00:44] Are going to get that full 3000 under the old rules. It was part if you owed tax on part, even if you didn't but now it's going to be fully refundable. And the fourth thing is that they are going to start sending out checks or, you know, direct deposits on a monthly basis. And they're saying, they're going to be starting that in July.

[00:01:01] So about a month from right now. So yeah, I said, you know, and my response was a 250 or $300 per kid per month. You know, plus unemployment benefits, you know, so if you have a single parents with three kids, that could be like $4,000 a month in some states, and that you'd have to make $60,000 a year. Before the net proceeds bounces out.

[00:01:20] So that got me thinking actually, you know, the. The unemployment benefits are, you know, very, they vary quite a bit from state to state. So I went ahead and I looked up you know, unemployment benefits by state. And I found this site we're on population review.com and they have this this handy-dandy table Virginia, for some reason, their dad is messed up.

[00:01:40] So I, I corrected that to what I think it is, which is you know, this number divided by 52, which puts it at about $726 a week. But then I threw that into a spreadsheet. And I said, well, you know, if that's true so people on unemployment, you know, they will, they can get a certain annual benefit. And then they're going to, if you don't, if they're a single parent or, you know, married parents, whatever it is, they're going to get credits for their kids.

[00:02:05] And you know, how much what's the welfare cliff on that? Like, you know, how much do you have to make at a job before that starts to, you know, balance out, you know, what you'd be giving up and not employment benefits. Cause you're gonna get the kid credits either way, but still it's, it's, it's a decent chunk of change.

[00:02:22] So the way, the way this model is, is calculated is, you know, I took the table that they had even took all the states, took them maximum weekly benefit amount. And you know, you might not get the maximum, but you know, it's. Play with numbers as you will maximum weeks. And so you multiply this by this, you get a number and that's the maximum somebody could get on unemployment in a given year.

[00:02:47] And you know, the numbers vary widely. So, you know, 20,000 in Washington, all the way down to 6,000 in Arizona. So, you know, it's, it's a big spread there on top of that. People, you know, if they have two kids, I, you know, for this model, I just said, one is under six and one is over six. So they're going to get $550 a month.

[00:03:07] That adds up to $6,600 a year. If we add those two numbers together, the unemployment and the kid credits you're come out with a total annual earnings. And this is all tax-free because the. The unemployment benefits will be below the taxable threshold, you know, for a head of household or married filing joint filer.

[00:03:24] And the kid credits are credits, you know, so they don't get, they don't get included as part of the taxable income. So yeah, you're looking at at, you know, tax-free earnings of anywhere from, you know, on the high end 25 to $27,000 on the low end. You know, Florida's the very low end nine, 900 but in 12, 13, $14,000.

[00:03:47] So that is what people could potentially be paid for for staying home. You know, if they have the two kids you know, if they've got three kids, it'll be more. If they have one kid will mean less, they have no kids there'll be less. But you know, two kids is a decent Yeah, approximation. I think so then I was thinking, what, how much would you have to earn at a job in order to make that same amount?

[00:04:08] Cause you'd be giving up the unemployment benefits. You'd still get the kid credits. But you'd be paying even if you don't pay any income tax, you'd be paying a social security tax and Medicare tax you know, your FICO contributions. So. You know, if you were making 18, nine 44 in in unemployment benefits, you'd have to make 20,005 13 after paying social security and Medicare in order to come out to the same after tax earnings.

[00:04:36] But you know, that's not real number. It's not a real comparison because you're comparing, staying home, doing nothing. To going to work right. Going to work involves a lot of extra expenses. You know, there's, there's transportation back and forth. There's clothing, you have to buy there's childcare, you know, there's, you know, meals out that you might not otherwise have.

[00:04:55] So there's a lot of extra costs built into having a job that's not included in just the tax withholdings. You know, and, and I ballparked that at 10 grand a year. And you know, maybe that number is high. Maybe it's low, whatever it is, but it changes the. The minimum that you'd have to make to have, you know, the same standard of living and had the same take home pay that you would to the, to the situation where you have unemployment and the kid credits.

[00:05:21] And so the numbers go up a lot, you know, instead of 20,000, we're talking about 30,000. So, you know, it's, you know, there's a report that came out. Yesterday. I think it was with the, with the unemployment numbers that there's nine and a half million open job positions. And a lot of those are in the hospitality and, you know food service industries.

[00:05:41] So, you know, it's no wonder, right? It's like, well, I'd have to make 30 grand going to work in order to just break. Even with the, you know, with the benefits I have for not doing that. So. You know, what's, what's the incentive to do that. You know, if you start making 40, 50, $60,000 a year, maybe maybe it's worth it at that point, but for, for just breaking even, I mean, w why bother that's, that's a rational decision to not do that.

[00:06:06] So so, you know, it's you know, people are, are wringing their hands, you know, as over the state. Oh, the economy it's like, but, you know, people are responding to the incentives that they have and, you know, and, and rightfully so. So, yeah. I don't expect any of this to change. I don't expect the employment picture to change until, you know, these incentives change and obviously, you know, that's a hard political thing to do cause you know, you'll be accused of any everything under the sun for, you know, cutting off people who really need it.

[00:06:35] And maybe they're right. I don't know. You know, maybe, maybe this will be the push that we really need to get automation into these, you know, lower. Lower skill positions, you know, I'm reading an article the other day about how McDonald's is trialing AI assisted drive-throughs where, you know, when you talk into the, to the box at the drive-thru, you're not, you won't be talking to a person who would actually be talking to a voice recognition system.

[00:07:00] And you know, there might be something to that because a lot of times they get my order wrong. So maybe that maybe that'll end up being a better experience for everybody involved. But yeah, so 30 grand, 20 grand you're breaking even with staying home on unemployment and you know, that's just, that's just not worth it.

[00:07:17] So for anybody who was you know, skeptical or confused by the employment picture, I hope this helps. Now what these people would actually be better off doing is you know, they. They run it, they run down their unemployment benefits, you know, get this amount, start a small business on the side, make five, $10,000 in self-employment income.

[00:07:38] And then they will get that money. Plus they'll get the earned income credits for the kids. So that would actually be the optimal situation where you know, they get. The whole, you know, they could stay home. They do whatever they do for self-employment, which, you know, a good chunk of that is online and they can do gig work or freelance kind of work.

[00:07:57]Or, you know, if it's actually going to work and going out outside to do something, whether it's, you know, landscaping or you know, delivering food or taking care of people's kids or whatever it is you know, you, most of those are service businesses. And so they would get the earnings from that.

[00:08:12] And then the earned income credit would take care of it, of their of their self-employment tax. And then we give them, you know, another five grand on top of that. So that would actually be the best situation that, that the people in this situation could, could employ. And then you're only talking about working for a month or two and you know, maybe three, whatever, whatever the net earnings work out to be As opposed to working all here for, you know, not much better pay.

[00:08:38] So I hope that helped that shed some light on the situation, but I thought it was interesting to actually put some numbers to it.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

In WA just unemployment is $4400 a month with the state plus the federal payment adding up to just under $1,200 if you qualify for the maximum amount.

I'm going to have to buy a couple of kids.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Plenty at the border. For free!

Okay, that was a bad joke...

But they could make $2.13/hr + tips working on their feet all day and dealing with rude customers!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I am a bit lost with the overall numbers and there is a lot of politic also kind of blurring the overall picture.

But this is definitely a change for the US. You will have the joy to have family built to make kids and live off the system.

If you are kind of lazy and do not want to work (having kids is work I know). In Europe you make 4 kids, you get some money from the state and they can go free to eat at school, on vacations sometimes etc...

You are not rich but if you game the system you have a lot of free time and can make it without working hehe 😉

Yeah we are headed in that direction

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

What a great way to destroy the work ethic that made America great.

In 100 years El Salvador will be one of the wealthiest countries in the world and the USA one of the poorest. Look what happened to Argentina in 100 years.

The welfare cliff has been a thing for a long time. It's just been exacerbated recently.

It's hard for me to see the US turning into Argentina. It's just so big and has so much wealth and productive capacity. The US could definitely turn into a has-been like the UK though.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

100 years ago Argentina was one of the wealthiest countries in the world.
It was "so big and had so much wealth and productive capacity".

https://theeconomicstandard.com/argentina-from-rich-country-to-poor-country/

Socialism and the political instability it brings can destroy a country.

Read about what happened in Argentina and see if you don't see familiar things happening in the US today.

Yeah, I hear what you're saying. I just don't think the US will go down the path that far.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Not even close.

The United States has the advantage, as Neal was saying, of productivity. The work ethic required to work crap jobs is not really a work ethic but human slavery. It was only going to be a matter of time before Neal was placing his order to an automated order taker at McDonalds as compared to a human.

Corporations have been trying to get rid of people for decades. Now they have the incentive and political cover.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Very interesting video. This is a multi-faceted situation that few are not looking at. Too much ideology and less real analysis.

Corporations now have the cover of across the board, full blown automation. They are furthering this idea by promoting the we cannot get workers. Well, perhaps if you would offer more money and better working conditions, then you would have more workers. But they dont want to do that.

Hence, where forced to pay higher wages, they will only speed up the automation process. This is a good thing because society is better served by automation. It increases productivity, reduces health expenses, and eliminates crap jobs. Of course, it does generate another problem, what to do with all those workers.

By the way for some context, there were an average of more than 5 million jobs before COVID not filled, a point where I feel the economy was running stronger than it is now.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Of course, it does generate another problem, what to do with all those workers.

This is the thing that worries the powers that be.

Personally, I have come to terms with the idea that human wants are infinite and human ingenuity combined with the profit motive is infinite as well. People will figure out what to do with their time and talents.

Technology is always a deflationary force. It allows us to do more with less. I'd actually be perfectly OK with the government paying people to do nothing as long as we have a free market in money. And we're getting there.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Corporations now have the cover of across the board, full blown automation. They are furthering this idea by promoting the we cannot get workers. Well, perhaps if you would offer more money and better working conditions, then you would have more workers. But they dont want to do that.

Too long they just not willing to pay the right amount and still are in some areas.
And complaining about the issue having employee in the first place.

Somewhat reminds me of the time I went to community college.

Around half if not more of the students in entry-level classes never bought the book, never took notes, and never passed any classes they took. They then would just have to appear before a “committee” to be given a second chance for more government aid to retake the classes, housing, unemployment, and who knows what else they qualified for since they were "going to college" and where low income.

They would just show up once in a while asking everyone else if they received their “refund” yet. Aka all the money they did not spend from government aid they got on a debit card they could go spend on whatever they wanted like shoes.