Sort:  

It gives everyone an equal say based on their SPS accumulation.

Oh I agree and understand the mechanic, but I think a lot of people forget the whole "based on their SPS accumulation." When the top 50 people can surpass the amount needed to pass a proposal, it makes things pretty one sided. And aside from requiring KYC to vote, which I think should really be considered, there's not really a good way to judge the overall communities response (unless you're looking at the selloffs taking place with each new proposal). I'd be curious to see how a lot of these proposals would've played out had the votes been tallied 1:1.

!BEER