Does the voting really speak for everyone though? Or even the majority of players? The top 50 votes alone are worth over 60 million SPS. With 180k daily active users, that's hardly an accurate representation of the community as a whole.
!PGM
!PIZZA
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!
The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-0.1 THGAMING-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]
5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!
Discord
Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP
Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide
I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444
It gives everyone an equal say based on their SPS accumulation. The ones with the most SPS have the most influence. This is by design to bring value to SPS and the overall Splinterlands economy.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Oh I agree and understand the mechanic, but I think a lot of people forget the whole "based on their SPS accumulation." When the top 50 people can surpass the amount needed to pass a proposal, it makes things pretty one sided. And aside from requiring KYC to vote, which I think should really be considered, there's not really a good way to judge the overall communities response (unless you're looking at the selloffs taking place with each new proposal). I'd be curious to see how a lot of these proposals would've played out had the votes been tallied 1:1.
!BEER